this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37691 readers
296 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You might boot laptops straight into a cloud OS in the future

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Personally, I find KDE Plasma to be extremely easy to use. I prefer it to Windows, but that could also just be familiarity.

I've also not had a catastrophic failure in I don't know how many years. I have several machines running Linux and the only time I reinstall is when I get a new computer. 20 years ago we were still running XP or maybe Vista and I absolutely remember reinstalling XP several times. Windows even today has it's share of "expert-level" fixes too. I find the incantations to fix Windows problems even more mysterious, and often coming from sources I'm not sure I can trust.

In any case it's all anecdotal, but I wanted to offer a counterpoint in favor of Linux. :)

I do recommend giving it a go, as it's really improved a lot in the last several years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I will keep giving it a go. I mean, I've been trying to get into Linux for like 25 years 😂

What I mean by windows being easier to recover from, if there's ever an issue, is that it has multiple layers of restore, repair, and other modes that are very user friendly.

Just installing a simple app in Linux often involves numerous lines in the terminal. My wife would 1000% never be able to use Linux. LMAO

Mind you, I've only really tried various flavours of Ubuntu, so many there's a better distro for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't need to use the terminal to install a program at all, at least on Debian with KDE Plasma. You can either download a .deb file and install it with the graphical deb installer, or you can open the software centre (Discover for KDE) and search for it. You can even add extra repositories graphically (and for Debian, you probably are going to want to enable the non-free repo by doing this, which I think has a tick box).

I've also never had Linux break on me, unless I broke it myself after poking things I shouldn't poke.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, when deb files exist, I go for that! There have been instances where I'm following a tutorial for whatever I'm looking to do, and it's always terminal commands. I grew up using DOS, so i get PTSD when I see the terminal 😂

As for breaking, i don't remeber the distro (a major one), but I'd have instances where after some time the ram use would just grow and grow until everything came to a halt. Even with 32gb of ram i was having this happen often enough that i had to stop. I do still think my desktop pc still has linux installed as a dual boot with windows, but I've been using a laptop exclusively for a long while.

I'll still continue to try. My computing needs aren't excessive and i lived with a chromebook for years as a daily driver before getting a windows laptop.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Installing software is one of the big blockers I see with people, especially when they're used to downloading a random executable from a website somewhere. (haha! Anyone remember Tucows?) Ubuntu has also been making their installation worse lately with pushing Snaps, which always seem to be only partially integrated into the rest of the system. I have been playing a bit with Flatpak distributed software and it seems to work well, with some nice UIs to browse the various repos. I'm also a fan of AppImage for the ease of distribution. But yeah, just the fact I have to type this out means it's quite different and yet something else to learn.

Good luck with your Linux adventures! :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Fedora Silverblue has a read-only OS and uses Flatpak for apps. It’s pretty hard to break while being pretty simple to install software.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

appimages just got less easy…

i don't know which update did it - i think it must have been os-level (i run pop_os, derived from ubuntu) - but appimages silently stopped working. double-click, nothing. finally i looked in the log out of desparation, which said 'appimages require fuse'.

more accurately, appimages require fuse 2 and the os had just upgraded to fuse 3. the fix is to heat-seek libfuse2, and don't mess with any other fuse-related package as things can start wrecking themselves:

sudo apt install libfuse2

originally seen on an omgubuntu post

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oof! That's unfortunate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

say to hwr that's like in her cellphone, just download from the native store, maybe it's easier that way