this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
1096 points (97.7% liked)

People Twitter

5228 readers
637 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

My version of this was renter's insurance. I knew about home owners insurance, but somehow I assumed that in the case of an apartment the owner would already have insurance. When my oven caught fire I learned that I'd be responsible for it. I don't recall too much of the initial rental process as that was years ago, so I don't know if it were somewhere in the paperwork but I never recalled even being asked about it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Renters insurance isn't that expensive and worth having. If you rent and the place burns down, none of your stuff is covered by the landlord's insurance. Pretty sure you also can get personal liability coverage in case you get sued.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I never bothered with renter's insurance. I never had very valuable stuff, and certainly nothing I couldn't afford to replace.

That was probably stupid, but I own now so I guess I got away with it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Oooh, this one's even trickier these days because some/rental companies will provide their own rental insurance as part of the lease, and give you no option but to pay for it, citing some obscure law or whatever. The trick though, is that rental insurance doesn't cover you, the rentee, but you don't know that unless you wade through the legalese yourself. Then they try to convince you that you don't need any other renters insurance, because you're already covered, which is of course a bold faced lie.