this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
18 points (80.0% liked)

Technology

1279 readers
54 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No need to sound pretentious. Even now your comment isn't super clear.

almost every news headline that ask questions

Do you mean ethical questions or general questions?

almost always should result in a NO answer

Do you mean writers set up a question and it typically ends with them disagreeing?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The fact that you’re calling my explanation pretentious tells me you’re looking for an argument, so I’m going to end this here. Look it up if you need an explanation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

My comment about you sounding pretentious was in regards to

It’s a well known concept

I was asking you to clarify what you were talking about and you immediately came off as demeaning and full of yourself.

I don't know if your explanation relates to ethics and the news, consent, or clickbait. Without knowing what you are talking about I couldn't even argue with you if I wanted to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I did no such thing. It is a well known concept whether you are aware of it or not. Just as there are tons of things that are well known to many people, but not to me. This does not change the fact that it’s well known.

Instead of accusing people of being pretentious, you could instead just ask what they meant. You might get a better response as people aren’t obligated to respond in kindness to insults.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Instead of accusing people of being pretentious, you could instead just ask what they meant. You might get a better response as people aren’t obligated to respond in kindness to insults.

My original comment was asking "What do you mean?". I asked someone else what you could have meant and they explained it as "It means if you have to ask whether something is ethically okay than there's a strong chance it isn't". You could have just explained the expression.

Your comments in this thread like

The point I made which you missed, is….

didn't really help my opinion of your tone. People are just trying to discuss the topic.

Either way I think my thoughts are inline with @[email protected] when it comes to that and it was in a parallel thread with you so I won't bother rehashing it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago