this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
461 points (77.6% liked)

Memes

45535 readers
1113 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
461
quick reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Give me an example of a communist country that has not resulted in the creation of an authoritarian government.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is an authoritarian, both liberal and conservative wants capitalism, the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. You don’t have choices.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Give me an example of any single communist country with an authoritarian government

And note that what I just asked for is like asking for a sandwich without bread

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're not wrong, but also give me an example of ANY country that doesn't resort to authoritarianism when the government is threatened by a plurality of citizens.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are plenty of governments out there that aren't authoritarian. What do you mean when you say "the government is threatened by a plurality of citizens?" What is the nature of the threat in question? A democratically-elected government that puts down an armed rebellion from part of its populace doesn't magically become authoritarian simply because it used forced to maintain its existence in response to a domestic threat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I mean that there is a realistic existential threat placed on the system of government, by a large part of the population. By plurality, I mean that the largest segment of a population (even if it's not a majority).

You're telling me that govt's that put down a large rebellion don't then start introducing authoritan laws like monitoring communication, restricting free speech, and targeting non-violent sympathizers?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...any democracy? Different governments get voted out of power constantly. A lot of countries elections are almost 50/50

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would say you’re arguing from ignorance then. The civil war in America happened because slavers didn’t like the outcome of an election.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They asked for an example of ANY country that doesn’t resort to authoritarianism when the government is threatened by a plurality of citizens. You can choose any currently functioning democracy after a tight election.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The question becomes then, are those stable democracies threatened? I would argue no, that you’re using irrelevant examples to prove your position.

American capitalism was threatened to an extent by Bernie’s campaign and a contemporary cnn headline compared his “rise” to that of Hitler. So you tell me. Do they get defensive when actual leftist principles are on the line. Looks to me that it is the case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ukrainian stable democracy seems very threatened at the moment. I am not too into American politics so i dont know about the Bernie situation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Democracy itself gets voted out, without any resistance?