this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
238 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4512 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate is working to pass a $95.3 billion foreign aid bill with assistance for Ukraine and Israel, but it may be days until a final vote as GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky is using arcane and complex chamber rules to slow down the process into the weekend.

The chamber cleared a critical 60-vote threshold to advance the bill on Thursday, and took another procedural vote Friday night. But without an agreement from all 100 senators to speed up the process and swiftly pass the legislation, the Senate is expected to work through the weekend with a final vote next week.

“I think we should stay here as long as it takes,” Paul told CNN’s Manu Raju on Thursday. “If it takes a week or a month, I’ll force them to stay here to discuss why they think the border of Ukraine is more important than the US border.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why do you keep using social virtue signals to prove you’re right? People can be right about one thing and wrong about another. You and certain other users gang-dragged me before and I stuck by my position, agree with you on others and I’m not worried you disagree, using only insults and social virtue signaling to do. I said what I said. I dummy agree with taxpayer dollars supporting fascism, at home or abroad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I see, pointing out that the premier LGBT+ publication in the U.S. probably wouldn't support a Nazi is 'virtue signals.'

Also, 'gang-dragged?' Do you think we got together and coordinated or something?

Also also, please quote me insulting you- or was that a lie?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes; idk but it’s certainly hive mind; so your asking if I was from a certain server wasn’t an insult in your mind, nor your whole holier-than-thou condescending tone in all the posts past and present, wrt the same topic: disingenuous at best, sure. Here, this user said it all, after the first time you particular three brigaded Mr the first time I expressed myself wrt funding Nazis, I resolved to no longer waste time defending my position:, but this user thoughtfully used a lot of time to make good points, which probably won’t phase you. https://lemm.ee/comment/9122407

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait... so you think we're literally psychically linked? Because, believe it or not, I don't even know who else you're talking about when you say "you particular three."

Also, that user did not claim Zelensky is a Nazi. You did. You have done nothing to support that claim. Maybe do that rather than claim I insulted you when I didn't and implying I have ESP.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You’re an immature child making wild accusations and putting words in my mouth. Goodbye.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Let's see... The three claims I made in that post...

  1. You said Zelensky was a Nazi. You did. https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/825852/-/comment/5093641

  2. You claimed I insulted you. You did. https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/825852/-/comment/5100485

  3. You implied I had ESP. You did. https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/825852/-/comment/5100689

So I'm not sure which ones of those are wild or where I put words in your mouth. I'm also not sure why you have to lie like that.

Furthermore, I'm not sure why you would indignantly accuse me of insulting you, deny you accused me of insulting you, then insult me by calling me an immature child.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nice try, but unfortunately for you, I'm able to read.

Also, I notice you didn't address the whole 'immature child' thing right after complaining about me insulting her. I guess you think it's okay when she does it but not okay when you decide I do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pointing out your hypocritical double-standard is not whataboutism. Sorry.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't apply a hypocritical double standard. You made a false claim and used whataboutism to deflect when I pointed it out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Okay, you're welcome to believe that.

The fact remains that Zelensky is not a Nazi.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Of course he isn't. Did you click the link to the source I provided about actual Nazis in the Ukraine military?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Your link was not relevant to the person I was talking to's claim that Zelensky was a Nazi.