this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
609 points (94.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
857 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    LVM has snapshot support ๐Ÿคจ? Is this a new thing?

    ZFS and BTRFS also have other uses like RAID-like functionality and detecting and possibly correcting data corruption - with only one drive these features are not as useful though.

    Yes they are. Regarding data integrity (bit rot or read/write errors) though. Regarding data backup, no.

    BCacheFS is new to the mainline kernel and does much the same as ZFS and BTRFS, when distros start offering this as a supported option it's probably a good idea to use this, kind of unfinished at the moment though.

    I think kernel support is planned for version 6.7... I think.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Yeah it's included in kernel 6.7. Still probably too new to really use as they are still working on certain features like erasure code/parity.

    Without another drive it can't rebuild data, so all it can do is detect corruption not correct it.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Yeah, that is still too unsable in real world scenarios.

    Still, it's great that people are doing this from scratch, not just build on what Oracle throws at us. I do wish they address the RAID5/6 issue properly, not just throw it under the carpet like BTRFS. I did hear that they are working on fixing RAID5/6 in BTRFS, but I haven't looked at how far things are. I still use it with mdadm in the background for the array.