this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1379 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5277 readers
407 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Did any company ever used DRM to disable physical media remotely? Is this even technically possible?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Not exactly what you're asking about, but this comes to mind

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexplay

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

DIVX kinda worked like that. You'd rent a disc and it'd work for a few days and then stop. You could pay for a few more days, or pay more to make it permanent.

It sucked and was one facet in Circuit City's slow motion collapse (good riddance).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'd argue that that's still better that that shutting-down-digital-purchases deal, because with DIVX (and Flexplay, which was mentioned in another reply) you'd at least know in advance, before you buy, exactly how long you have to watch the DVD. Much better than buying things to add to your backlog and having them taken off the digital library before you get to consume them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

that was the big problem with “online only” games that people fought against when it first started. Now people just accept that their physical media is just a rental

Xbox one is an example of this, the server is still up so if you get a new one then you can still update it into a usable state, but once that server goes down then any not updated to their no longer always online patch it is junk