25
How Albanese could tweak negative gearing to save money and build more new homes
(theconversation.com)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]
Negative gearing will never be removed.
It's nothing to do with the voters.The politicians are the landlords
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/article/politicians-and-their-property-portfolios-how-many-do-they-own/wb7k9xq1p
We literally just had politicians vote against their own self interest by reducing stage 3 tax cuts.
It’s possible they will do the same for negative gearing.
Politicians didn't need the tax cuts.
They already gave themselves a 4% pay rise, their biggest increase in a decade
Aren't their wage increases determined by an independent group/board ?
And the President of that is a former CEO of Australia’s largest commercial property services firm, and former National President of the Property Council of Australia.
C'mon, you know how this works