this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
23 points (92.6% liked)

United Kingdom

4065 readers
542 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This seems a little confusing to me.

They aren't allowed to raise up rates too fast because they missed targets related to sewage and leaks.

But the only way for them to fix it is to spend more money on tackling sewage and leaks, which would come from raising rates.

There is definitely the argument that the dividends and bonuses should be used for this rather than raising rates, but that is different to preventing rate raising because service levels were too low.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's why companies that get privitised are so keen to issue dividends and bonuses: If it turns out there has been shit going on, the dividends are long gone, and it's extremely difficult to claw them back.

Bunch of utter bastards. Issue massive dividends, saddle the companies with massive debt, then wait for the implosion that gets bailed out by the govt. So either the money lenders or the taxpayer pick up the tab.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I completely agree with your position, and surely that's the one that should be taken by the regulators.

But it isn't.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not the only way, they could operate at a loss to make up for their mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, once upon a time in the not too distant past, companies would earn smaller profits to produce better quality products and services. But now the mantra is all-consuming growth, regardless of actual quality and performance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

You completely miss the point of my comment.

But that's fine.