60
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We need higher density zoning, and better public transport.

Hubs of high density housing joined by good public transport is, IMO, the answer.

Urban sprawl certainly isn't it. And these housing estates where they cram 30 houses on an acre is rubbish. All the negatives is single home ownership without any of the positives.

Also: why the hell doesn't government have more trades on the books? QBuild could be so much more than it is.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

All we need is to force businesses out of the cities. IT will solve transport problem big time. There is no need for cities anymore.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Three reasons why cities/'large conglomerations of people and technology' remain necessary,

Communications infrastructure still has large costs. Decentralisation is good, but the costs do increase, there is a balance point between the extremes. Lemmy and the wider fediverse is a great example of a search for that balance point.

Network effects, alone with my own thoughts i'm a scrub with a mug, together with others help those thoughts can become gems.

Company towns, an extreme but possible outcome, are a bad idea. It is a monopoly using geography and societal connections to reduce the competitiveness of your employee base.

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)

Australian Politics

1261 readers
14 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS