this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
294 points (91.1% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3575 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Well it's simple, what are the Democrat voters going to do, vote 3rd party?

They're held hostage to the party, so the party has no need to reflect them, it just has to be less bad than the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Of everyone who claims no third party could win would actually coalesce around and vote for a third party candidate, the third party would win. Their children apparently aren’t suffering and starving enough, yet.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

That's not true for the president. They are not picked by popular vote but the electoral college, and it's "first to get half the Electoral College votes", not who ever gets the most. It takes a literal majority, otherwise Congress or some other suits just get to pick.

The US is absolutely not a democracy when it comes to 2/3rds of its branches of government.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Considering the Senate is just two assholes per state and the House would have over a 1,000 members if we had the same ratio as 1789 I'd expand that to all three branches.

It's not a legitimate government, but we all pretend it is. Especially the people with guns.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Well, a "legitimate" government just needs to retain control, and they definitely have control. Though yes, the US is definitely not a legitimate democracy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Idk about that. Maybe, but if we keep doing the same thing expecting different results, we’re definitely not getting them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The problem is you're only focusing on one branch.

Congress has an amazing amount of power... the problem is a majority of them are really only concerned with their own piece of the United States of Pie. Their first, second, and only concern is being re-electable. Start focusing on electing more people who actually have the people's (all the people, not just their specific constituents, mind) best interest at heart and you can have effective change.

Constantly focusing on the Presidential election, and only the Presidential election and you lose out on most of the power in this country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Start focusing on electing more people who actually have the people's (all the people, not just their specific constituents, mind) best interest at heart and you can have effective change.

The problem is that the person you want to elect will lose to someone who selfishly serves their constituents, because their constituents vote for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

What about of those candidates are never on my ballots?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Everyone wants a third party, but not everyone wants the same third party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

That’s true but many actual leftists will coalesce behind a better option.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

No they wouldn't, it would, at most, be a deadlock between the three parties that the House would decide on. One would hope they would go with the one with the most votes, but in reality they can pick anyone. Including someone who wasn't even one of the top three candidates.

Not to mention all the people who want a "third party" aren't necessarily going to vote for the same third party. They all want their own person. Most likely none of them would get anywhere near the majority popular vote, much less any electoral votes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Ranked Choice Voting: "It smell like bitch in here"

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

what are the Democrat voters going to do, vote 3rd party?

Sit on their hands like they did in 2016.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You mean the election that had record voter turnout all over the country? Is that what sitting on your hands means?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

And yet still barely two-thirds of people eligible to vote.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They could vote for any of the other DNC candidates.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Unless you’re in Nee Hampshire right?

Or like we saw with Bernie, they’ll sabotage your campaign and rig the DNC.