67
Xbox owners have once again hit back at Microsoft for "very disappointing" advertisements
(www.eurogamer.net)
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
67 points (94.7% liked)
Games
16558 readers
798 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ban what? Advertising?
While I would like this kind of crap to stop, I don't see how you would properly legislate to ban it.
Instead, I think we should look at requiring any changes to software to not be possible to hijack your equipment and remove features.
So if you choose not to update, you can. Currently, they ban you from online play if you don't. Force them to be backwards compatible and they will. Force the updates to provide user benefit and they will.
Bricking devices, like happens all too often when support ends or a cloud server shuts down should entitle you to a full refund unless they specifically offer it for only a period.
Sony recently with the loss of content. Microsoft with the windows ads. Microsoft with the Xbox ads. Amazon with the ad insertions. We need to combat enshittification in general. Force service portability and force backwards compatibility.
Don't threaten me with a good time.
In this case, specifically - banning ads in shit you already paid for. If there's a subscription fee, then selling your time and attention to someone else cannot possibly be excused with 'but but but how will they make money? (sad eyes emoji).' It's just greed.
Same shit for any gizmo that costs five hundred dollars and still has the unmitigated cheek to call that price 'subsidized.' Was that price put on you by a vengeful wizard? No. You chose to lose money. Seems like a stupid move! Not our problem to fix, by being propagandized at, on top of the 30% you make on every game same, and the subscription multiplayer fee.
Control of your hardware is important but not strictly related. Stallman was right. But I don't need to appeal to software freedom to say, if you pay $200 for an operating system, or $500 for a console, or $120 per year for service, then at the very goddamn least there should be a big obvious button that makes all the ads permanently fuck off.