this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4065 readers
695 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure seems like an awful lot of this was caused by the school being overly heavy handed in their actions towards the child.

Also the argument that pupils shouldn't be wearing 'signs of political allegiance' looks a bit odd when they're flying a Union flag over the front gate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Protesters gathered at the site before Christmas as anger grew over letters the school sent to parents which mentioned potential referrals to Prevent, a key part of the UK's counter-terrorism strategy, for any "extremist and divisive comments".

Staff at the school were also accused of "bullying" the young boy at the centre of the row, claims which they have denied.

In a subsequent statement published on its website, the school strongly refuted any allegations of bullying or misconduct by staff and said the wording of its earlier letters had been "misappropriated".

Staff had also been forced into "aggressive and confrontational interactions" with members of the public and had been "overtly filmed" doing their jobs, the letter said, causing "unwanted distress and anxiety".

Its main reception service would be closed for the "foreseeable future", it added, as well as restricting access to the school at pick-up and drop-off times.

Leyton and Wanstead MP John Cryer said threats and protests outside any school were "beyond the pale - however upset people are".


The original article contains 526 words, the summary contains 170 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!