this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3918 readers
56 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The dark side of range anxiety: Currently available EVs stateside are far heavier than they need to be for a 10-mile commute, causing more generation of particulates from tires than ICE vehicles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why aren't we taxing vehicles by weight? Regardless of what powers it. Wouldn't that incentivize smaller, lighter, and more efficient vehicles? Instead of the "I'm the biggest on the road" arms race we have now.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

OH wow.. whoah. idk where to start with this. Ok, that would require people to adjust their lifestyles and actually do something. But WORSE, it would ask the auto industry to change. Sorry, this is a non-starter.

Slash S

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It would make the roads safer as well. You're more likely to be badly injured or die in a crash with a giant SUV or truck than with a compact car.

The US should be using Japanese style kei cars for commuting, not Explorers and F250s.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They do in Australia. My 1.7 tonne station wagon costs a good deal more to insure than my wife's Kia Rio.

On the other hand, the fact we have to register each vehicle when we can only physically drive one at a time strongly discourages people owning two cars, so they end up with the bigger one in many cases even though most of the time a smaller car would be fine.