this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
36 points (75.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers
464 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
36
Economically failing nuclear plant to receive 1.1B bailout (apnews.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"President Joe Biden’s administration on Wednesday finalized approval of $1.1 billion to help keep California’s last operating nuclear power plant running. "

Because renewable energy sources are too expensive?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

How many solar panels and backup batteries would that buy? At $20k per home, that’s 50000 homes that could have their own power system.

According to a couple of articles, a nuclear plant like this can power 500000 homes. So not too shabby of an investment?

https://www.businessinsider.com/georgia-nuclear-reactors-billions-over-budget-years-behind-schedule-2023-12?op=1

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Not only that, the nuclear plant will be producing power at its stated capacity 80% of the time or more, only coming offline for maintenance and refueling. Those solar panels will only produce its stated capacity 30% of the time of so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacity_factor