this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
823 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
59232 readers
4387 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Generally it's agreed the best way to stop piracy is by offering a more convenient alternative. I generally for example don't pirate video games available on Steam. With streaming services being so disjoint and expensive now I've gone back to pirating, at least with cable you can bundle channels.
I buy steam games, even ones I've already pirated, for a few reasons.
Quick and easy downloads
Seamless updates
Almost all my other purchased games in one place.
Cloud saves
Durability, just knowing my games will be available to download on my next PC for the foreseeable future.
And I pirate just about everything I watch mainly because I'm not willing to play musical subscriptions to watch the shows I want to see at the end of a long day.
If the film industry had a service that offered a similar experience to a Plex share, I'd pay quite a bit for it. But instead they have this system designed to extract maximum value from every viewer, and I'm tired of it.
Gabe Newell was right on the money when he said piracy is a service issue, not a price issue.
To add onto this, when someone who can't afford something pirates something, there is no lost sale because there never was a sale there to begin with. It didn't take any money away from the company since they were never going to see any money from that person.
With that said, the only piracy I partake in is for archival purposes, and like you I buy Steam games regardless because it's too convenient like you said.
And if you really like a game, why not supporting their devs
Yep, and when netflix took off piracy took a dive because of how good it was. Then every studio decided they wanted their piece of the streaming pie so pulled all their content off netflix and released their own streaming service, so now we're basically back to having to pay $100 a month to get access to everything, just like we were with cable before netflix changed the game. Shockingly, piracy has shot up again.
These companies are so stupid and greedy.
The only games I'll pirate are ones that are no longer available to buy, because what else am I supposed to do?
It's morally positive to pirate games that are no longer available for sale. Piracy is stealing, but in this case, you're stealing from the void so there's no harm done, and preserving the game is a morally good thing to do.
For about the same price as it currently costs to bundle all the major streaming platforms. Plus, cable never had anything near the amount of content we have now on streaming.
I think people who compare cable to streaming don't remember what it was like before streaming
I'm not sure how you mean the last paragraph, but P+ already removed Star Trek Prodigy, and I think it just stopped "airing" so people might rightly want to "record" the show.
I haven't seen that show in so long. It was cancelled way too soon. I may have to, um, acquire it...
I liked it, yes, it was because of Ted Danson. I would watch a show where Becker and Dr. Cox from Scrubs just had a sarcasm-off.
Why can we buy games cheaper on other services then?
Steam works and the prices are good and I don't see them buying exclusives. That's good enough for me nothing is perfect.
GOG is good if the game you want is on there. I got the ultimate edition of Fallout New Vegas for like £5. It was like £10-15 on Steam at the time. Great deal. The main issue is they're strictly anti-DRM for offline games so the bigger developers are less inclined to put their games on there, but whatever.
yeah, exclusives are the big one for me. I choose to game on PC because it's less bullshit. exclusives decidedly fall into the bullshit category and the EGS is full of them
The way Epic handled competition was by strong-handing exclusives constantly without actually providing a better service. Last time I bought a game from Epic, it didn't even have a cart system to buy games in bulk. Couple that with the tolerance of cryptocurrency/blockchain and acquisitions of sites like Artstation and Bandcamp, and yeah - people have reasons to not like Epic. I've heard stories of people getting locked out of their banks because of the lack of a cart and they were buying a lot of games in a short amount of time. I've also heard stories about people's Epic accounts getting breached because of Fortnite BS.
And I'm saying this as someone who uses multiple launchers. I hated Steam back in the mid-2010s (skipped the middleman and bought GTAV from Rockstar directly) and they were in quite a bad rut with Steam Greenlight and the paid mods fiasco. People were rightfully loudly critical of Steam and at a time, Valve really did not deserve taking a 30% cut. They've done a lot since then to recoup that lost trust and deserve the 30% cut, Proton and the Steam Deck being a massive part of that for many people.
Yeah the amount of "No steam no buy" fanboys is absurd. They act like having to open a different program to see their games is like hacking into the matrix. Not to mention that there are already programs like GOG Galaxy that compile all of your games from all your services in to one GUI.
I used to be annoyed about the memory usage of running multiple game launchers but now it's a bit of a non issue with 32gb ram. I don't even remember what I had when it was an issue.
I've had a very pleasant experience every time I've talked to Steam Support. What's so bad about them?
Steam is definitely not as bad as you're making it out to be.
I think they forgot how tv works.
I think a much better comparison than Steam would be Spotify.
I use Plex for all my movies and TV shows for the same reasons you mentioned. All my stuff can be in one place instead of having to pay for Netflix, Hulu, Peacock, Disney+, HBO Max, Amazon Prime, and whatever other fucking shit is out there.
Plex also supports music libraries, but I don't use that feature. Why? Because Spotify has literally 99.9% of all the music I want to listen to, and aside from maybe like Garth Brooks, the other 0.1% is on Youtube. Spotify did it right by just having a basic service that you can pay for and get everything you want. If I had to subscribe to Spotify, Tidal, Napster (Still a thing I guess?), and 4 other services just to access all the music I listen to, I'd go back to piracy.
With Spotify slowly starting to reach a limit in subscribers, it's unfortunately only a matter of time until they start pulling what Netflix is doing and finding new ways to get money from customers.
Spotify is already making people pay for sound quality that's akin to a TDK C90
Audiophiles out here in denial of the fact that 99% of music is played via Bluetooth.
I don’t care if my streamed music isn’t the absolute best quality when I’m listening on AirPods or in my car.
What does Bluetooth have to do with it? First there are lossless Bluetooth codecs and even if you don't use one of them, good source material still helps. Imagine a jpeg that was resaved multiple times to get an idea how artifacts stack.
Spotify's codec should in theory even be good enough to not be distinguishable from CD quality, but somehow some songs just sound like shit anyway. I suspect it's a problem with how they were digitised.
I'm using the free version of tidal instead. In the beginning I had a problem with some things not being on there, but that has mostly been resolved.
I'm also just using Sennheiser momentum true wireless 3. No fancy audiophile equipment.
What does Bluetooth have to do with it? First there are lossless Bluetooth codecs and even if you don't use one of them, good source material still helps. Imagine a jpeg that was resaved multiple times to get an idea how artifacts stack.
Spotify's codec should in theory even be good enough to not be distinguishable from CD quality, but somehow some songs just sound like shit anyway. I suspect it's a problem with how they were digitised.
I'm using the free version of tidal instead. In the beginning I had a problem with some things not being on there, but that has mostly been resolved.
I'm also just using Sennheiser momentum true wireless 3. No fancy audiophile equipment.
Then just use Apple Music. Has the same roster of tracks but with better quality overall for free.
Spotify also has a free ad-supported service, which while it does have ads, isn't as bad as radio, or needs you to go to the effort of pirating the music you want.
Gabe Newall said himself that piracy is never a price problem, but a service problem.
That's such a simple yet legendary quote.... moreso with each passing decade
Go Gaben!
Never have wise words rang more true...
I have towed this line for years. Recently Battlefield 2042 was available on steam for a great price so I snapped it up. I'd played it at release via a 1 month trial of EA play and it was absolute trash.
The game is totally fixed! The problem I have, is that I bought it on steam...and it forces me to install and keep myself logged in to the EA app anyway. It fails to launch the game every single time. I have to reboot my computer, manually log out of EA and log back in. It is an absolute shitfight, because EA gargle balls all day.
My point is, I bought the game on steam and I got absolutely duped. I'm all for a bigger library, but not if it means I have to install and use the other crappy apps anyway. Such a disappointment, I won't be so quick to buy on steam anymore unless they implement a great big flashing red warning that the game is not actually on steam at all.
They do put the warning when a game needs a 3rd party launcher tho?
Yeah, I get that stuff like that sucks. Funnily enough, I think it's a little better on Linux because the EA games app is incapable of running on Linux so Proton boots it just long enough to get the game working, and then it fades back into the background. While Linux gaming is still not perfect, that kind of thing is one of the reasons I prefer it over gaming on Windows.
I swore off buying games from companies like EA, and Ubisoft years ago. I'm still bitter about getting duped with Far Cry 3.
Also stopped pirating games when steam came around. And I stopped pirating shows and movies with the rise of streaming services. Now though, I'm looking into standing up a media server.
I respect that. I'm not setting up a media server because I would expose myself to legal liability, but the people brave enough to actually distribute the content I'm consuming have my full respect.
You still can...
I think Hulu has a decent bundle with Disney, and Paramount with Showtime isn't bad.
That's like 4 for 20 bucks. And lots of cell plans come with one free. So it wouldn't be hard to get a lot of options for 20-40, which is still way cheaper than cable.
Netflix is just starting to get real expensive. If they'd have kept some of their originals from the last couple years I wouldn't think of canceling, but since they cancel those shows a week after a season drops, I'll probably drop Netflix soon.
still asking too much, I'll keep sailing the seas if that's how much it costs. Plex and jellyfin currently fill this role for free
Everyone's finances are different.
i have crappy internet and there's no way to preload a movie with netflix so the service is useless to me. i have to torrent
That's unfortunate but understandable.
I think with gaming that is a factor, but personally I think the larger deterrent for pirating games is at least for multiplayer games you can't really pirate them while still being able to play online most of the time.