this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
64 points (93.2% liked)

News

23268 readers
2910 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is not an admission that COVID was engineered. The overwhelming scientific evidence is that it had a natural origin.

https://www.science.org/content/article/evidence-suggests-pandemic-came-nature-not-lab-panel-says

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s not an admission that Covid-19 was engineered. It’s an admission that the lab at the epicentre of the outbreak was engineering corona viruses to make them more dangerous.

Without data, which China has destroyed, any research such as the paper you cite is working blind. I’m sure natural origin does seem the likely theory given the precedent they cite. But our intelligence agencies are privy to more than guesses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You cannot study viruses without gain-of-function research.

As for intelligence agencies, you're incorrect in your assumption- https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/23/us/politics/covid-lab-leak-wuhan-report.html

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You cannot study viruses without gain-of-function research.

We absolutely can study viruses without gain of function research. It just takes longer.

As for intelligence agencies, you’re incorrect in your assumption- nytimes.com/…/covid-lab-leak-wuhan-report.html

If you're arguing that intelligence agencies are unreliable, why are you linking to a report from an intelligence agency?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We absolutely can study viruses without gain of function research. It just takes longer.

No. You cannot reliably study what a virus is capable of without it. All you can do is hope it mutates in a certain way.

If you’re arguing that intelligence agencies are unreliable,

I'm not, I'm arguing that they disagree and the ones who say it is a lab leak say so with low confidence.

why are you linking to a report from an intelligence agency?

I'm not, I'm linking to a New York Times article (hence nytimes.com) about how they disagree and the ones who say it is a lab leak say so with low confidence.

This is something you would have known if you had read the article.