60
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Very possible unfortunately. Not having an answer for basic questions like how many people are appointed, how they’re appointed, and for how long is pathetic.

The cynic in me goes straight to that there’s a reason why they’re not divulging these things and it’s because the yes voters wouldn’t like the answers.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

More billshit, that assertion has already been directly disproven earlier in this thread. Why are you so committed to posting misinformation?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was not disproven. If it is then you should be able to answer my questions in the comment you replied to then, right?

How many people are appointed?

How are they appointed?

How long are the terms of appointment?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Someone already answered this for you here. I have engaged with you in good faith previously, but it's becoming increasingly clear you are completely full of shit and are simply attempting to spread doubt and fear.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not "attemping to spread" anything. I'm undecided on how I'm going to vote and I'm trying to decide.

Why do some of you guys just attribute everything you don't like to malice?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Trying to decide"? Let's review the evidence:

  • Repeatedly asks the same textbook conservative No campaign questions in every thread.

  • Refuses to read any of the replies - even when they directly answer the questions being asked.

  • Openly lies and says no one has answered the questions, even when there is clear evidence to the contrary.

Hmm, I'm gonna go with a [X] Doubt on that one bro.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not a "conservative". Have literally never voted for the LNP. I've voted for the greens more than I've voted for Labor in my 20+ years of voting.

Quit with the bullshit accusations.

What you call "answering the questions" is not what I consider an actual answer to the question being asked. The real answer as I know it now is "it's up to the government post referendum, and can change whenever the government at the time wants", but those aren't the "answers" being thrown around.

You're the person that said unless you've had a lived experience that makes you want to vote No, you should vote yes. That's ridiculous. Automatically assuming it's a good thing is dumb, though I'm not surprised with your "you're an undercover conservative running a fud campaign" comment.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m not a “conservative”.

I never said you were. Strawman harder.

What you call “answering the questions” is not what I consider an actual answer to the question being asked.

Someone literally gave you direct answers to all the questions you asked, as well as a link to where they could be found. You never replied to that comment. In fact, you straight up ignored it then continued to ask the same questions later as if they hadn't already been answered hours ago.

Automatically assuming it’s a good thing is dumb

Another strawman. Do you have anything of substance to say or is it just going to be crying from now on?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Lol we both know you were saying I’m a conservative by saying I’m just repeating conservative talking points. I believe you guys call it a “dog whistle”.

You said everyone that hasn’t had a lived experience that makes them vote no should vote yes. Where’s the straw man? What is it with you guys and incorrectly using your progressive perpetually offended sayings?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

we both know you were saying I’m a conservative by saying I’m just repeating conservative talking points.

Nice fanfic.

You said everyone that hasn’t had a lived experience that makes them vote no should vote yes. Where’s the straw man?

This is not what I quoted and responded to. "Automatically assuming it’s a good thing" is an argument I never made.

I believe you guys call it a “dog whistle”.

What is it with you guys and incorrectly using your progressive perpetually offended sayings?

Finally taking that mask off?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Finally taking that mask off?

Finally admitting that you're a perpetually offended "progressive"?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Read the responses others have already posted; you’ll find that your asinine bullshit has already been roundly disproved. You’re constantly posting content you know is false. Why?

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
60 points (96.9% liked)

Australia

3520 readers
157 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS