this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
662 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19240 readers
3256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry, can't find any better sources for this.

The animator then asked Maher what the “downside” of “getting a vaccine” was, which caused the comedian to go on an anti-vax tirade.

“The fact that you the fact that you don’t even have a clue what’s the cost of getting a vaccine that you don’t know the answer to that. You completely want to shut your eyes to the fact that there are repercussions to all medical interventions, including a vaccine, all vaccines,” he ranted. “They come, they say side effects, just like every medication does. You can see it in the literature. They can’t write it on their back on the vaccine. So you have to dig them. And of course, there is a vaccine court because so many people have been injured.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Is there something in the water? What the fuck is with this spread nonsense? How the shit did preventative medicine become a target for these people? Will they find toothpaste shouldn't be consumed en masse and rail against that?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Bunch of people, mostly old dudes, have a fundamental aversion to not being the smartest person in the room. They latch on to whatever gives them the opportunity to be contrarian and in an environment of social media and disinformation they don't fully understand they spiral out into neofash, deluded stances becoming their entire persona.

Rant about something you're wrong about, get the whole internet telling you how dumb that is, get defensive because you can't be the one who's wrong, get radicalized. Welcome to the 21st century.

Source: I can't believe I didn't spiral down that toilet myself. Seriously, I should be one of those assholes. I can't believe I noticed just in time before the Internet weaponized that personality type into the death of democracy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Bunch of people, mostly old dudes, have a fundamental aversion to not being the smartest person in the room.

Talk about hitting the nail on the head. And where does this come from? We all know that guy. He's our dad, or whoever - but we all know at least one. So it's nearly ubiquitous. What I wonder is: what is this a product of? From where does this arise?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Oh, it's me. I'm that guy. I mean, look at my post history here. I invented being that guy, except Maher is older than me, but I'll still argue about it because I'm that guy.

It comes from being somewhat above average in school, and getting a bit of a reputation for being precocious and smart and not really having anything else going on so you may as well double down on it and have a thing. Plus if you ride that wave confidently enough it'll get you a full on career. And once you get validated by sucess, or whatever you personally consider success-adjacent enough, there's no way them kids are gonna show you up. Ever. No matter what. Every hill is worth dying on. Because that self-image. Is. All. You. Have. All you've had for decades now.

Man, I should go hug my dad. I can point at the two or three conversations we had that made me at least try not to be that asshole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can also have had a professor for a dad. My dad and his colleagues basically spent any social time they had together trying to play "who's the smartest?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

As a cishet guy I hate hanging around with other cishet guys because they're constantly trying to assert dominance

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Deep-seated self-esteem issues. It's the same reason they drive big stupid trucks and why men aged 50-65 consume half the beef in America: They're desperate to feel powerful like men are supposed to be, according to them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Big pharma doesn't have clean hands, millions of people died and no one says shit but we're still crying about a few hundred businessmen dying in 9/11, the same kind everyone goes EAT THE RICH about. Everyone is so psychotic in their everyday life and this is the least baffling thing if you've ever read a history book or a newspaper