543
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

True.

If you’re going to risk being jailed, might as well go out killing a CEO.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

That's definitely not more ethical and that suggestion is abhorrent by any ethical framework. Murder is wrong except in self defense. If you start justifying murder based on political actions, you enable it in response and that typically leads to actual fascism.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Murder is wrong except in self defense.

What counts as self defense then?

When somebody has a knife at your throat? What about people planning to put a knife to your throat? What about people creating plans to dump toxic waste into your neighborhood?

At some point a line must be drawn. So why shouldn't that line include the rich who dump astronomical loads of emissions, poisoning our air and water, and otherwise killing the planet?

There isn't calls to eat the rich simply because of a difference in political opinion. There is a lot more to it than that.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You unfortunately justify violence against yourself in that case because you escalated. All of the examples you mentioned are hypotheticals and not real or part of this context. Additionally, if it is publicly known, it is also within the rules of society and I'm very against punishment without a trial by peers. You are no better than the rural folks around Salem distrusting the rich witches in the town who controlled their distribution, unironically.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All of the examples you mentioned are hypotheticals and not real or part of this context.

The first 3 are, the last one is not.

https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/carbon-billionaires-the-investment-emissions-of-the-worlds-richest-people-621446/

In addition to the above, there is also the fact that roughly 8 million people a year are dying from climate change. Climate change that is heavily driven by billionaires. What about the self defense of those 8 million that die every year?

Additionally, if it is publicly known, it is also within the rules of society

This statement has some very "Let them eat cake" energy.

You are no better than the rural folks around Salem distrusting the rich witches in the town who controlled their distribution, unironically.

I haven't murdered anyone. Nor have I based any of my argument on something false. So this is not true.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
543 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38558 readers
3351 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS