this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
314 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19080 readers
5042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

e; I'm adding an edit message at the top of this comment - don't make death threats against Republican lawmakers. They're not actually being intimidated into doing things, they're just using these death threats as an excuse, and the cops and prosecutors are going to go way harder on anyone left leaning, so it won't accomplish anything besides putting you in a prison cell.

If this is what works on these shitbags then clearly the problem here is that they aren't getting enough death threats from people who want to keep their democracy in this country

Republicans fall in line because they're amoral dirt bags who never had any interest in serving this country and just got elected to help themselves, the fact that they can be intimidated into serving Donald Trump is just further proof of this painfully obvious state of affairs

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't even be fooled by this. They want these things and so they allow themselves to be cowed by these threats, but if they started receiving threats from the left you'd be seeing a call to arms.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Yeah, totally agreed, the "they want these things and allow themselves to be cowed by threats" thing was exactly my point, I should probably edit that to be more clear

Also, beyond the call to arms for vigilantes, you would also see a much much more aggressive response from law enforcement (like, compare their response to the Bundys occupying some territory vs the cop city protesters)

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If the political left and/or minorities engaged in the levels of political violence that the right does, the reaction would be swift and severe.

Recall that American conservatives were supportive, if not outright pushing for, firearms restrictions when it was the Panthers bearing arms.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Exactly. You can't use the same kind of threats to stop this. It takes doing something like enforcing the laws against threats