5
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22524 readers
56 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
-
Posts about mental health should go in [email protected] you are loved here :meow-hug: but !mentalhealth is much better equipped to help you out <3.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
landback isn't about kicking white people out, in most interpretations. it's about collective tribal ownership of land, which, around socialist principles would promote preservation at the expense of private industry. it's not a proposal to have indigenous people come in and just take over the capitalist machinery at the expense of whites, it'll in theory be better for everyone and probably in practice much like the minority SRs of the USSR---russian settlers remained and had political rights, the formerly colonized just got a bit more.
No, it's not, but you know that's how reactionaries would frame it. And it would work.
if reactionaries had free press, but any large scale implementation necessitates a socialist order that wouldnt allow that
How are you going to stop it? They are already primed for that narrative. You can't just wish away the backlash that WILL happen
By not having a free press would be the easiest solution.