this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
104 points (81.7% liked)

RealTesla

478 readers
1 users here now

  1. Posts must be about Tesla, EV, or AV
  2. Meta Posts must be pre-approved.
  3. Shitposts are limited
  4. No Elon Worship
  5. All Links must include the original title of the Content
  6. Sites behind Paywalls must have text included.
  7. Don't be an asshole
  8. No Image Posts

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
104
It Took 36,000 Gallons Of Water To Extinguish A Burning Tesla (jalopnik.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A new crash recently in Alabama, but a reminder to something that we all know. Burning Teslas are far more difficult to extinguish than any other car.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There's plenty of proof in academic literature. FePO4 is quite stable because of the quirks in iron's valance up to about 500C. But the combination of of lithium skews the valance effects at high temperatures to start losing oxygen at 250C.

Please review the following literature for more information:

  1. C. Delacourt, P. Poizot, J-.M. Tarascon, and C. Masquelier, Nat Mater., 4, 254 (2005).
  2. J.L Dodd, R. Yazami, and B. Fultz, Electrochem. Solid-State Let., 9, A151 (2006).
  3. G. Chen, .XSong, and T. J. Richardson, J. Electrochem. Soc,. 154, 4627 (2007).
[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How much oxygen are we talking here? I'm guessing not much, as they wouldn't be allowed to sell lifepo4 batteries as non combustible if they had any real chance of causing a self sustaining fire. So level with me so I don't have to trudge through a bunch of academic papers: How much oxygen do they mention?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

The stoichometry comes out with 2:1 moles of lfp to diatomic oxygen which is significant

The combustibility you're referring to is a legal definition not a scientific one