politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Both sides need to be willing to have lasting peace in order for this to be a legitimate discussion. Notably Hamas has rejected the last ceasefire offer, after breaking the last agreement, and states plainly they do not want peace and will not stop until Israel is no more.
Why are we hellbent on asking Israel to just sit and take it?
Stop killing innocents =/= "sit and take it"
If Israel had conducted this war in a reasonable fashion and actually focused on Hamas they wouldn't be facing this criticism. 1,200 dead on October 7th. 20,000+ dead in Gaza. Isn't this enough?
Rockets are still shot at Israel. They had a fairly large barrage the other day. Will that stop under your cease fire?
Or is it Israel ceases and Hamas fires?
Yes of course. That's what it means
Then tell Hamas, because it takes two, and they ain't dancing.
Maybe if Israel indiscriminately bombs some more civilians Hamas will change their mind and start dancing?
So if Israel stops then Hamas will stop and return all the hostages. That's quite a fairy tale.
Renoved under rule 3, keep it civil.
Removed under rule 3, keep it civil.
Removed under rule 3, keep it civil.
Anyone you disagree with does not get a logical argument. They get name calling,
I prefer to be realistic and acknowledge both sides have to agree and forcing a ceasefire, which you can't, on one won't do much good. Thanks for the name calling, BTW.
What do you think Israel should be doing to lower the number of innocent civilians killed?
They're already doing way more to prevent civilian deaths than most people would expect, conversely hamas goes out of their way to kill innocent civilians every chance they get.
Maybe not bomb hospitals and apartments? Funnel fleeing civilians through active combat zones? Maybe not force Palestinians off of their properties?
Hamas is committing atrocities that are par for the terrorism course. We should t expect them to play by the rules.
Isreal is a globally recognized and sanctioned government, committing genocide and war crimes.
Both sides need to stop.
I want them to just fucking stop until they've figured out how to accomplish their purported mission without going full Holocaust, unless of course that is their mission. It's their fucking job, not mine.
I think that's an unfair representation of what Israel is doing.
A lot more fair that what Israel is doing in Gaza and the West Bank.
What I mean is that comparing an occupation to the holocaust is unfair because the Arab citizens of Israel aren't treated as second class citizens, they arent isolated in ghettos and they certainly aren't being rounded up and placed in concentration camps.
If Gaza and the West Bank want the violence to stop they need to make strides towards peace, otherwise why would Israel just hand them autonomy on a silver platter if it means 100+ more October 7ths?
Hey look, it's 2001 George Bush everyone. This will surely not end in disaster!
What was true in 2001 as it is now, is that it takes two to tango.
In other words: an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind and Israel is engaging in terrorist activity just the same and to a greater scale.
But the other use is right, and it's no surprise. Here's a prime minister who's been in power as long as Putin and a part of the same neoconservative right-wing nationalist bent as the puppeteers of Bush.
Netanyahu and right-wing extremists in Israel have no interest in settling this. That was proven when a right-wing Israeli nationalist assassinated the former prime minister who sought to resolve the conflict in earnest.
No. It takes two to make a ceasefire. That's the truth and it always has been.
A ceasefire in 2001...?