this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
234 points (98.0% liked)

News

23649 readers
3861 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a California law that would have banned carrying firearms in most public places, ruling that it violates the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and deprives people of their ability to defend themselves and their loved ones.

The law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September was set to take effect Jan. 1. It would have prohibited people from carrying concealed guns in 26 places including public parks and playgrounds, churches, banks and zoos. The ban would apply whether the person has a permit to carry a concealed weapon or not. One exception would be for privately owned businesses that put up signs saying people are allowed to bring guns on their premises.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You aren’t arguing, you’re just claiming you’re right and pretending that because of that you don’t need to justify shit.

Um... that's literally what you're doing. You are not backing up your declarations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just did with a link to a peer reviewed study and a detailed explanation of a common gun control proposal. Try again.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which claim do you think that proves? Because I asked you to prove multiple claims and, as far as I can tell, that was not one of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That the liberal media is deliberately causing them to promote their anti gun views. CNN has way more blood on their hands than the NRA ever has.

Name a single proposal you think will prevent or mitigate shootings. I’ll wait.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That, again, does not prove any of the things I asked you to prove. I'm not going to name any proposals, because it's not my job to prove your claims are wrong. It's your job to prove your claims are correct. That's how the burden of proof works.

Now, these are the claims I would like proof for, please:

1 - "None of the current proposals with any sort of support from the democrats will make any sort of a difference here."

Please prove that none of the current proposals with any sort of support from the Democrats will make any sort of difference. Not one proposal, not ten proposals. You said none. Please back this up.

2 - "The issue isn’t the guns but they focus on them and deliberately encourage them to create emotional responses to try and ban them."

Please prove that they are deliberately encouraging them to create emotional response to try and ban them. You have not even begun to do so.

3 - "Semi auto bans, magazine capacities, UBCs; none of them do a damn thing to prevent or mitigate mass shootings."

This should be very easy to prove, yet you did not even attempt it.

4 - "There is tons that can be done to prevent and mitigate them but the alt left wants them to happen so they can ban guns so they will continue happening."

Please prove that the "alt left" wants to ban guns so that mass shootings will continue happening. You have not proven this.

I have very little faith you will prove a single one of these claims because you sure have not so far.

On the other hand, you could very easily say, "I can't prove those, they're just my opinions." I doubt you will, but please do prove me wrong on that one because it would be refreshing on the internet for someone to actually admit they can't back up their claims.