this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
200 points (83.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3420 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Trying to blame the great great great great great grandson for the sins of his slave owning great great great great great grandfather.

I don't understand this mentality. Is it OK to have pride in one's ancestors and their accomplishments? Why does pride get passed down while shame washes away?

People who say their ancestors didn't immigrate until after slavery and therefore are innocent should sit the fuck down when the national anthem is played because your people weren't here for the war of 1812 either.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You take pride in your great great great great great grandfather..? Cringy flex but whatever.

Okay, let's say you do. Why should any of his accomplishments 200 years ago matter in how I judge you?

Speaker Johnson is a little weasel rat fucking religious zealot. Trying to shame him for something so far removed is dumb, bad politics, and worse, terrible journalism.

As for your rant about immigration arrival dates, national anthem, and the war of 1812... are you well...?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why should any of his accomplishments 200 years ago matter in how I judge you?

I love how for your argument to work you have to ignore all of history since then and the fact that the disparity created by those slave owners doesn't only still exist today, but is still actively perpetuated and maintained by some of those same people who now have power to make laws or at least enough wealth to influence those who do, because of and under the influence of the wealth, privilege, and systemic racism they inherited directly from those ancestors.

Pathetic deliberately ignorant racist.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

One of my ancestors was Lord High Chancellor of England. It doesn't make me proud; that would be silly.