Technology

37719 readers

133 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

160

Threads Has Begun Federating Via ActivityPub (daringfireball.net)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Adam Mosseri:

Second, threads posted by me and a few members of the Threads team will be available on other fediverse platforms like Mastodon starting this week. This test is a small but meaningful step towards making Threads interoperable with other apps using ActivityPub — we’re committed to doing this so that people can find community and engage with the content most relevant to them, no matter what app they use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sun sued MS to stop them from calling it "Java™", then Oracle failed spectacularly to EEE it when they lost the API lawsuit against Google.

MSIE's popularity arose from monopolistic practices by Microsoft, not its EEE tactics against HTML, which failed miserably.

I would know it, I was there: everyone started making websites in Flash because it was the multiplatform solution, even if it had more security holes than a female duck cornered by a flock of horny drakes, only MS sellouts used MSIE's proprietary extensions to HTML, only Oracle sellouts used post-Sun Java... and it all went down the drain the moment JavaScript evolved to a point of allowing polyfills to make a single codebase compatible with all browsers.

Now all browsers are FOSS-based, with de-branded forked versions making the rounds, and it's good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sun sued MS to stop them from calling it “Java™”

Because that was part of MS's EEE strategy.

MSIE’s popularity arose from monopolistic practices by Microsoft, not its EEE tactics against HTML, which failed miserably.

Ooo boy you do not remember your history.

When Microsoft started pushing IE, they did everything in their power to sabotage the competition. That included the creation of a proprietary web extension called ActiveX. Back in the day, this, along with non-standard behaviour when dealing with the actual standards, was the reason why many, many sites would not work in non-IE browsers. Developers only cared about what worked in IE, not what was standard. That didn't change until the arrival of Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You know how trademarks work? Sue or lose it.

I remember my history quite well, all the way back to Mosaic and before. I also remember "Best viewed with Netscape" websites (1994), when everyone and his uncle had a proprietary plugin they were trying to push, and only a handful of developers (I was one of them) actually cared about any standards. Firefox (2004) came very late to the party, way after the "MSIE can't be uninstalled from Windows" shenanigans (1997).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You know how trademarks work? Sue or lose it.

Wouldn't have applied in this case. Microsoft actually did have permission from Sun to use the trademark...right up until they made their Java VM incompatible with base Java, and Sun sued to terminate the agreement.

I also remember “Best viewed with Netscape” websites (1994), when everyone and his uncle had a proprietary plugin they were trying to push, and only a handful of developers (I was one of them) actually cared about any standards. Firefox (2004) came very late to the party, way after the “MSIE can’t be uninstalled from Windows” shenanigans (1997).

Okay? And? None of them had any actual leverage to force people into using their standards. Microsoft had a de facto monopoly on an essential bit of computing software that they leveraged to hell and back to make their proprietary standards THE de facto standard.

Firefox (2004) came very late to the party, way after the “MSIE can’t be uninstalled from Windows” shenanigans (1997).

And at that point, IE had a 97% market share. Care to take a wild stab in the dark why?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Microsoft had a de facto monopoly on an essential bit of computing software that they leveraged to hell and back to make their proprietary standards THE de facto standard.

And... they still failed miserably. All their anticompetitive agreements to force PC sellers to preinstall Windows with MSIE as the default browser, all their agreements with Apple to make MSIE the default browser on OSX, didn't change the fact that ActiveX was as popular as Java outside of intranets, and everyone turned to Flash to overcome the incompatibilities between browsers.

MSIE was a scourge for web developers, because every web had to be checked with the majority player who wasn't standards compliant, yet it still didn't manage to take over HTML, not even with a 97% market share, not ever.

My main browsers have been MOSAIC, Netscape, then Firefox, during all that time. I can say with a straight face that I only ever used MSIE, Opera, or Safari, to make sure a web was still working in them, while 99% of the WWW was still working fine with a standards compliant browser (plus Flash).

Nowadays all browsers are standards compliant... with the living standard that is Chromium, which not even Google itself can EEE (see how Firefox is adding Manifest V3 without deprecating the adbloker API that Google wanted to extinguish).

Microsoft actually did have permission from Sun to use the trademark...right up until they made their Java VM incompatible with base Java, and Sun sued to terminate the agreement.

That worked pretty well to stop Microsoft's attempt at EEE-ing it, didn't it? However, keep in mind that Java was not FOSS back then (1996-2001), it only got open sourced in 2006. The first stab at EEE-ing a FOSS Java, was Oracle's, and that didn't go well. Now Microsoft is releasing builds of OpenJDK, which they won't EEE either.