Technology

37719 readers

91 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

160

Threads Has Begun Federating Via ActivityPub (daringfireball.net)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Adam Mosseri:

Second, threads posted by me and a few members of the Threads team will be available on other fediverse platforms like Mastodon starting this week. This test is a small but meaningful step towards making Threads interoperable with other apps using ActivityPub — we’re committed to doing this so that people can find community and engage with the content most relevant to them, no matter what app they use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think people should know those are just mutes

its like that on mastodon too, user domain blocks won't actually protect you from harassment or your data being vacuumed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Still, if people don't interact with Threads content, that effectively keeps them separate.

Also, come to think of it, what's keeping companies from "vacuuming" everyone's data without actually having a public instance that has users interacting with posts on other instances? Example: Instance A exists. What's stopping a company that runs Instance B, which doesn't have any active users on it, from taking all the available data from Instance A? Genuine question, by the way. I haven't exactly kept up with the technical workings of Lemmy very well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have the same question. Lemmy and Mastodon are both public and as of yet, no one was able to tell me what "privacy" actually looks like for data in that context. Other than the fact that Meta will destroy it. It’s public, anyone can access it already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

that is not true, at least in mastodon's case. Mastodon has unlisted, followers only and direct messages those are visible for the instance admins if your account federates to them. That is concerning. I don't need Zuck to suck up my private posts

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

While that’s true, I’m not sure how many people are using Mastodon that way and if that’s actually the main concern. In the end it still is meant to be a public platform. Not on the same level of "private messages and photos" where most people would probably be very concerned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Seems like there's already accounts that repost content in an interactable way.