this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
416 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4814 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 93 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You can screech all about what he did, but if we ultimately aren't going to stop him from running, then what's the point of the circus?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Watch and learn how this is theatre and you have no actual say.

Maybe we should consider other ways to regain control for the benefit of the 99.99%

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Your comment seems to imply that you think an armed uprising is the solution you're suggesting. Is that the case?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Storm the Capitol! No… wait

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Nice try FBI

Edit: it's literally a meme

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not FBI, but if you think it's wrong to be mindful about seditious comments on the internet in this day and age, I'd say you have a tenuous connection to reality.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Opposing traitor trump is the furthest thing from seditious there is. It's the only thing any true patriot can do.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

While I agree, unfortunately whoever is in charge gets to decide what's "seditious" means. Right now we have the freedom (though many of us are probably on lists, which will be passed on to the next admin) to speak up against these fascists.

But if/when they take power? That's when there could be a reckoning. I, personally, am not a fan of violent rhetoric, but I wouldn't be surprised if my outspoken anti-fascist ideals would put me in the crosshairs when the fascist GOP truly gains control.

Personally? If it comes to Europe pre-WW2 levels of outright, blatant fascism spreading uncontrollably in the US, I would rather die standing up for what I believe in, than to use my white, middle class privilege and knowledge of how Evangelicals think to hide amongst them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I'm pretty sure the FBI isn't so stupid that they can't tell whether or not someone is talking about armed uprising until someone else asks them for clarification.

Or is this one of those "you can't arrest me if you tell me you're a cop" urban legends?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Guilotines are a good method

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because if he loses, he's going to face the consequences of his crimes. That has to matter. The rule of law has to matter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I understand that, which is the point I am trying to make. He's got a number of very serious criminal cases going against him, and so far has managed to weasle his way out of any serious consequence for all the shit he's pulled.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm personally hoping for imprisonment, financially debilitating fines, and prohibitions from founding or serving in any kind of corporate or nonprofit organization*, and for that set of punishments to happen to every single scumbag who had the complete disregard for morality and good sense that was required to ever do a favor for Donald Trump. Do that sort of thing to the right 200 or so people in this country and maybe our politics can stop being so fucked up all the time.

*As an officer/broad member/decision-maker, if they end up with a job as a receptionist or custodian at the local YMCA that's fine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not defending the guy or saying I agree, but there is already precedent of a Presidential Candidate running from prison: Socialist candidate Eugene Debs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, there's nothing keeping him from running from prison, and that's probably the way it should be, otherwise you could just jail your political opponents when you don't want them to win elections. But this guy has participated in an organized coup attempt essentially with his fake electors crap, and trying to get military personnel to step in. If you recall, he also started replacing top level military personnel after he lost, with the presumed intent of keeping himself in office. This goes way beyond the, I'm just your political opponent, and I should be able to run from prison if I want to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Hey man, I agree. I'm just talking about precedent. Given how things went during Trump's tenure, I see nothing suggesting anything will be different for Trump despite the nature of his crimes.