14
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

For example, NGS Super’s policy excludes investment in companies that make more than 30 per cent of their revenue from thermal coal mining.

As a result, BHP is not excluded because the $US3.5 billion it earned mining thermal coal last financial year only accounted for 6.6 per cent of its total revenue.

I can see a case being made for allowing >0, even if I don't really like it myself.

But 30% is ridiculous. It should be more like 10%, with an additional stipulation on maximum total, so a giant company like BHP which produces billions doesn't get away with it just because they also do a bunch of other stuff.

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Aussie Enviro

892 readers
2 users here now

An Australian community for everything from your backyard to beyond the black stump.

Topics may include Aussie plants and animals, environmental, farming, energy, and climate news and stories (mostly Aus specific), etc. New related communities will be split off when required, think like subcommunities that exist on that other platform.

Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

Banner Credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/takver/14871864504/

Aussie Zone Rules

Server Info

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS