this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
29 points (71.6% liked)

Astronomy

4122 readers
34 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unreadable data is still data.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is made of lots of little bytes of mayonnaise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm a fan of the many jars interpretation

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not unreadable. It's not data.

If you want to be pedantic you could say it's "transmitting symbols".

If I only typed out "abaababababbaab" over and over you wouldn't call it "unreadable words." You'd say it's not words.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Omg, you can't just type "abaababababbaab" on the internet you filthy animal!