cross-posted from: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/494473
Compared against the predominant incumbent social media platforms, the fediverse is very small.
information sources:
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1387 points (99.1% liked)
Selfhosted
40008 readers
1030 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Their protocol (called the "Authenticated Transfer Protocol" or "AT Protocol" for short) fixes some issues that ActivityPub has.
For example, you can use your own domain name as your handle, even if you're not hosting the server yourself. This makes your username portable - you can move to a different server but keep the same username. You just need to update some DNS records. It's not possible to move server but keep the same username with ActivityPub, since your username is always at the server's domain name.
What I'm hoping is that the developers of ActivityPub take some ideas onboard, but it'll be hard given the current design of the protocol. Maybe we'll get a new version of ActivityPub one day.