this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
63 points (95.7% liked)

Australia

3600 readers
63 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
63
Coalition tells Cop28 it will back tripling of nuclear energy if Peter Dutton becomes prime minister (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The federal Coalition has declared at the Cop28 climate summit that it will back a global pledge to triple nuclear energy if the opposition leader, Peter Dutton, becomes prime minister, but will not support Australia tripling its renewable energy.

Speaking on the sidelines of the conference in Dubai, the opposition’s climate change and energy spokesperson, Ted O’Brien, also said a Coalition government would consider supporting Generation III+ large-scale nuclear reactors, and not just the unproven small modular reactors it has strongly touted.

The statement at the global summit confirmed the Coalition was on a markedly different path to Labor. The Albanese government last week joined more than 120 countries in backing a pledge to triple renewable energy and double the rate of energy efficiency by 2030, but did not sign up with 22 countries that supported tripling nuclear power by 2050.

While only 11% of countries at the talks – mostly nations that already have a domestic nuclear energy industry – backed the nuclear pledge, O’Brien declared “Cop28 will be known as the nuclear Cop”

[. .]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This kind of segregation of topics didn't work on Reddit - I doubt it will work here on Lemmy, where there's way fewer users. In my opinion, post traffic is not high enough to introduce fragmentation at this point.

Just my $0.02.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

6 months ago some of us asked not to split everything into multiple communities. I even thought c/cities should have been c/states initially to be more inclusive.

Unfortunately, the majority tried to recreate reddit and then abandoned most of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For me, i've always treated c/Perth as WA in general, but i think thats more to do with having such a dominant city, for instance half of applecross is owned by wheatbelt farmers (i might be exaggerrating here lol). Perth as a stand in for WA kind of makes sense because almost everybody has a connection to it anyway.

For somewhere like Queensland maybe it makes less sense though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So i'd be down for name changes like this. Maybe c/Perth - WA, c/Melbourne - Vic

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's too late now but it could have been interesting to have tried something different than doing exactly what reddit evolved into. Evolution being a long process.

Once I saw environment issues only being posted into cities, I knew it was too fragmented. The lack of crossposting on the apps, or posting to multiple at once, probably doesn't help. And then your feed gets multiple repeats.

Just can't see a way around it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe i'm not understanding the issue properly.

Why are we unable to make name changes of communities to essentially reclasify them? And at the same time consolidate/remove some of the communities and tip them into broader subject area communities?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Nothing is stopping you. Getting it done is the hard part.

Good luck.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Agree button.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for the feedback,

I've been having a think about it and the divide between politics and news is always going to be difficult to maintain given how important politics is to our daily lives and people should be more informed.

Also considering @[email protected]'s comment, I think @[email protected]'s comment answers that. I think we were treating Aussie Zone more like a forum until we started to discover some of the limitations of federation. The segregation has always helped the local feed to be more organised and users can subscribe to only what they are interested in. A further discussion probably needs to be had surrounding the Australian News community, since a lot of that content could be helping this one to grow.

Perhaps we should make a "Good News" community to balance out all of the bad news about Climate Change, Politics, the Economy, the wars in Gaza and Ukraine and Public Transport.

What this all comes down to is the wishes of our users, our userbase has changed alot in the last few months with some disappearing and some new ones coming in from other instances

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks DHMO.

Several thoughts merged into one (pick any choose bits, not all or nothing):

  • c/Auslocal <- replacing /c/Syd /c/Melb etc. General discussion
  • c/AusInterestingNews <- "interestingNews" is probably better wording than "goodNews" as it might avoid some politics ending up there. Less drama for users & mods perhaps.
  • c/Australia <- people posting politics will probably default to the general "Australia" regardless of what rules you try to put in. If you roll with that and intentionally keep it as a honeypot then it might be an easier solution for users and mods? ie don't try and move the politics out of /c/Australia, instead move everything else out into c/Interestingnews.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing these ideas.

For the first idea: While it may increase exposure and activity, this might not be what people are after, likely only being interested in their own local community's news. But on the other hand exposure is good if you want to ask a question about something to do with Australia in general but not get lost amongst politics and news.

I like your thinking with the second two and they're definitely actionable. The content segregation is always going to be an uphill battle because not everyone will read the sidebar - especially since it doesn't get shown when creating a post making it almost useless. Perhaps we could repurpose the [email protected] community (currently called "Australian News") for the purpose of interesting news.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's the advantage of repurposing a community vs creating a new name?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

It's less hassle and we get to retain the subscribers, however, a proper launch might create some more interest

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Don't get me wrong, I'm a strong proponent of splitting general and politics.

I didn't like the Australia subreddit because of is 90% politics. I guess we could say splitting them "didn't work on reddit" because the culture was so ingrained and that's just the way it was.

It was/is worth trying something new here.