this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
133 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2541 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The top European Union court ruled on Tuesday that public authorities in member states can prohibit employees from wearing signs of religious belief, such as an Islamic head scarf, in the latest decision on an issue that has divided Europe for years.

The case came to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) after an employee of the eastern Belgian municipality of Ans was told she could not wear an Islamic head scarf at work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"We don't care about your religion, but we DO care about requiring you to show your hair" seems like a silly stance to take...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Because it is, and the commenter you are replying to is making it seem like it's even remotely comparable to denying service to someone because of religious conviction (eg. Denying a marriage license to a same-sex couple).

Except it's not, unless people are somehow offended by a woman covering her hair.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not uncommon for a specific case to set a larger legal precedent; it's basically how the USSC works.

Yes, this particular case is about a head covering, but the ruling applies to visible religious paraphernalia in general.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

United States Ship California