Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

🪲

Aussie Zone Rules.

Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

🐝

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Case for gas as transition fuel falling apart on both economic and environmental costs (reneweconomy.com.au)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@vividspecter Here's the key details from the article: "The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) today released financial modelling that shows Australia’s LNG projects did not generate value for shareholders.

"The report, “Australia’s LNG growth wave – did it wash for shareholders?” analysed returns from Woodside’s Pluto project, Chevron’s Gorgon and Wheatstone projects, the three east coast LNG plants supplied by coal seam gas, Inpex’s Ichthys project and Shell’s Prelude.

"It found these projects collectively eroded $US19 billion of shareholder value by requiring extra investment for running 35 per cent over budget and behind schedule, according to data from Rystad."

https://reneweconomy.com.au/case-for-gas-as-transition-fuel-falling-apart-on-both-economic-and-environmental-costs/

#ClimateChange #Climate #Green #Business #AusPol #Aus #Politics #Environment #Gas

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You're a fucking climate change denier. Stop bullshitting the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't this article highlight fossil fuel gas projects as economically flawed? How is this climate change denying?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you want to waste a few neurons on something so trivial it scarcely counts as drama.

Hypx is basically the only poster over on the hydrogen community, and takes anyone talking about the technology in anything less than glowing fluff or citing real world numbers as a personal attack on themselves.

The original commenter recently got into an argument with them on some methane produced hydrogen buses in Melbourne that involved denying every link and direct quote from various oil companies about how important hydrogen was to thier future with “no you”.

My guess is that the trend of inverting obvious reality becuse it looks bad for them continued onto this post.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah I'm lost, just read through and I'm not sure how this guy is a climate denier based on his summary of the article, like, at all lol.