675
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 147 points 9 months ago

Starts to make sense how some conspiracies come out when you get examples like this of people being blatantly ignorant of evidence right in front of their noses

[-] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago

In my experience it has less to do with stuff like this where people are just not looking close enough or are mistaken and more to do with the idea of them being wrong being impossible. Conspiracies that I interact with don’t even discuss evidence. Because they can’t be wrong and there’s no way to falsify their worldview.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A lot of it has to do with wanting to be superior. They have feelings of not having control so they tell themselves and each other that everyone else is stupid and being fooled but not them, they are the smart few, they know the truth, they are the in crowd.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I have wondered if there is just a tolerance people have for feeling dumb. How much can you endure? If you can handle a lot you can continue to learn, doesn't mean you will means you can. If you can't handle a lot you make your life in such a way as you don't have to feel that way. Like someone with a phobia who just always finds ways to not be around it. If I am right conspiracy theories are a coping mechanism to avoid the feeling of inadequacy.

For myself my work is willing to pay for me to go back to school part time and I admit there is a part of me afraid of feeling stupid around all those kids fresh out of high school.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

This sounds well thought out. I would say inadequacy and superiority are two sides of the same coin. If it helps you probably will be stupid around those other kids but not forever. You’ll get through it and be better for it. It sounds like you already know that

[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

This, in the post truth era, evidence is only useful to educated people that are willing. For most victims, we have to de program them first.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Every single discussion I have about climate ends with "yes, that's one side of the argument, but who really knows what's the truth".

Motherfucker, you said something that's false. I showed you you were wrong by a factor of several million. Where ever the exact truth lies, it's way on the other side of the fucking moon from your standpoint.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

You can't prove what's on the other side of the moon!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yes I can! It's mostly tacos!

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
675 points (96.3% liked)

Skeptic

1265 readers
20 users here now

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Things we don't like:

Other communities of interest:

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS