this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
596 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59169 readers
2540 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
596
Judge finds evidence that Tesla, Musk knew about Autopilot defect (www.reuters.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A Florida judge found "reasonable evidence" that Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk and other managers knew the automaker's vehicles had a defective Autopilot system but still allowed the cars to be driven unsafely, according to a ruling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not that people die crashing them, or even that a manufacturing/software defect causes the deaths.

It's that Tesla knew that there was a software error that would almost certainly cause somebody to die, and intentionally chose not to address the issues for financial reasons. That's textbook depraved indifference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that cost of a recall calculation scene from Fight Club.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And that's exactly why the depraved indifference rule exists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are there any famous examples of that being used?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Schlitterbahn waterpark is a fairly recent high-profile example.

The designers of the water coaster and co-owner of the park were charged with murder because they knew the ride was lethally dangerous and kept it running.

In fact, they'd paid off people hurt in other near-death accidents to keep quiet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the example! I'll definitely check that out.