this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1061 points (92.8% liked)
Technology
59145 readers
2234 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
She's getting a base pay of $6 million per year, plus the potential to double that in bonuses. She's 61 years old. I expect she'll go home rich and retire.
or she's also a weird bigot
In my opinion, when you prioritize money over values, it's just bigotry with more steps.
At least the end result is the same, even if the motivation is potentially different.
The two are not mutually exclusive. https://newrepublic.com/post/172699/linda-yaccarino-reported-twitter-ceo-right-wing-tendencies
Yeah it's a "¿Porque no los dos?" situation.
Yeah. The wealthy are just horrible people generally. I don't understand how people don't get it at this point. Thinking that there will be any moral consequences for their actions. Completely ignores their pattern of action. You don't get to be wealthy without being a shitty person generally. And if you are expecting shitty people to stop associating with shitty people. You are expecting disappointment. I think it's a fair bet that she won't retire. Probably move up to CEO of some other shell for another payout. I mean why wouldn't you when being CEO doesn't require actually running a company successfully.