132
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

I've only experienced that from them since I've known them. Not one wants a good faith discussion until you grovel to their fundamentalist tripe. Unity to them means blindly following their half-understood theories of centuries-dead men, and anyone who questions a lick of it gets the 4chan swarm treatment.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago

OP literally did not attempt to have any discussion of any kind, and explicitly said they had no interest in doing so

that's the definition of "not in good faith" homie

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Can't exactly have a good faith argument if the post gets brigaded.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

Why can't an OP have a good faith argument if the post gets "brigaded"? That doesn't really make sense to me. Anyone can choose to argue in good faith regardless of how the other party behaves.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Well for several reasons.

  1. You have to find someone who actually wants to have a good faith argument with you.

  2. You have to be disciplined enough to only argue with them, as you will expend energy arguing with the 500 other commenters who are just trolling you.

  3. Actually be able to go through your inbox and find the replies of the person you think is actually acting in good faith.

  4. Be in the mood to argue in good faith. Which is unlikely from the begining, basically impossible at the end.

load more comments (49 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
load more comments (57 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
132 points (82.4% liked)

Anarchism

1286 readers
1 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS