this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
545 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm brave enough to say what I am sure some people are thinking.

If a pedophile can have access to a machine that generates endless child porn for them, completely cutting off the market for the "real thing", then maybe that's a step in a positive direction. Very far from perfect but better than the status quo.

The ideal ultimate solution is to develop a treatment that pedophiles can use to just stop being pedophiles entirely. I bet most pedophiles would jump on such a thing. But until that magical day maybe let's explore options that reduce the harm done to actually real children in the immediate term.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some psychologists agree with you. Others say it would only make the problem worse, making them want to escalate. Definitely one that I'm letting the professionals debate on and I'll go with their opinion

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The consensus is that access to porn lowers rape. Does this extend to pedophilia? Probably, but not proven, in large part because of obvious reasons.. testing this theory is super duper internationally illegal

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some can't be cured by their own admission, its seems for some it is a deep seated sexual deviation that was probably established in very eaely life.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"By their own admission" doesn't necessarily hold any weight, though. They're not experts, and even if they were experts they can still be wrong. We've got treatments for a variety of psychological disorders these days, with varying efficacy, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that someday we'll make progress on this sort of thing too.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we have the tech to change people's brains in such a way, what else will it gets used on? Ethically, there's differences between pedophilia and other sexual preferences but I don't know if there's any biological differences. Given conversion camps are already a problem despite not working, I can't see how they wouldn't become a bigger problem if they did actually do what they claimed...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We have the tech right now to shoot people dead. It's just tech, create laws about what's acceptable to do with it and what's not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Even when conversion camp stuff is illegal, people still try it. Even if just DIY abuse (which is also illegal and still common). Simply not having the tech may be preferable to having the tech/knowledge, making it illegal to use it, and then people use it illegally anyways. If child abuse in general was something that could have just not been invented, not inventing it would be far superior to inventing it and then making it illegal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh yeah cause that's working out oh so perfectly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This thread is about how to regulate AI-generated child porn, that's going to require creating laws too.

What's your proposed alternative to using laws to regulate tech?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just saying that this tech that shoots people dead isn't really regulated all too well in certain parts of the world.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well, mainly just one. There are lots of other places in the world that do okay at it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You have offenders saying if you let me out I will do it again you don't think they are experts on their own feelings or behaviour), just like pscyhopaths some can't be fixed. As the word suggests pedophile means loving kids. While some are just nasty ass people, many see it as their sexual orientation (still nasty to harm kids obviously). Like being straighr or being gay. it can be hard wired. i'm sure with early intervention before 7 you might fix deviation or at least teach restraint from acting in it... but they have formed a concrete ldentity. I think larger strides will be made by protecting kids from sexual abuse at an early age than therapy after the fact trying to fix brain wiring