this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
631 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
2759 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't understand when and why Brave became such a household name. It seems so many people use it and swear by it, but its reputation is "suspicious" at best.

Just use Firefox. It's been around way, way longer and it doesn't use the Chromium engine. Google doesn't need more of a monopoly on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But what's wrong with non Chrome Chromium based browsers?

(Just give me downvotes, I don't care if my question is stupid)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well Chrome(ium) has almost all of the browser market share and google is trying to push something called web environment integrity which would implement a sort of certification system where web servers evaluate the authenticity of the client. If you extrapolate that idea a bit further it boils down to "we won't serve you content if we don't like your browser, device, OS, etc". Which I would consider as hostile to the open but rapidly closing internet as we know it.

Edit: I forgot to make my point lol. Firefox is a completely different browser engine from the chromium based browsers which is why you see a lot of people recommending firefox because they don't comply with web integrity. I don't think it's working though because this is something only the techbros and the cybersisters care about while everyone else just goes about their day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chromium is still controlled by Google, so having an overwhelming market share of Chromium-based browsers reduces competition and increases Google's control of the market's position and future. Using Firefox (and Safari, if it were not locked to a single ecosystem) reduces that threat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

When we say "controlled", that's still only accounting for the primary fork, right?

As long as it's open source, it feels like the idea is that the day Google pushes "feat(): Users now automatically have $1 sent to Google a day" commit, someone creates a "chromium-nongooglefucked" fork repository from the prior commit, and everyone uses that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It just means if they want to do something bad then they can

If Google wanted to they could ban VPNs on all Chromium browsers and all the forks downstream would have to comply

More likely they can make it so only verified websites will load and down the line charge to be verified. It kills the open internet and the ability for anyone to make a website/host it where they want

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a stupid question, some people just don't know.

Mainly it's because:

  1. Chromium holds too much market share which is bad for the health of the Web.
  2. Chromium is controlled by Google which is concerning because they have been known to plant trackers even in software that shouldn't have them.
  3. Chromium is inherently less secure, it contains features that might seem nice but are extremely risk to give access to websites i.e. letting websites access Bluetooth.

There are probably plenty more reasons but these are the big ones, and of coarse this is a simplification, in reality things are always a bit more complicated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Web dev here. Regardless of my opinion, I need to make sure my web projects work on chrome because of market share.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think if Firefox can find a way to have full parity with chrome extensions, that might be a big shift. I've talked to more than one person that has a specific extension they rely on that they can't duplicate with Firefox options. They have many of the big names, but also some holes

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It's the other way around in my experience

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Genuinely curious. What extensions are stopping people from moving to Firefox?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not OP, (and Firefox is still my main), but I keep Chromium-based browsers around for Ichigo, an addon which automatically translates raw manga - which is a godsend for avid manga readers like myself who frequently run out of existing translated manga to read. There's also Scan Translator which works in a similar way, but sadly Firefox has nothing like them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In my opinion best bet is ungoogled chromium for any extensions or applications that utilize chromium.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I just spent awhile trying to switch from Vivaldi to Floorp before going back. It just doesn't work as smoothly, things like tabs wouldn't save properly between sessions, pinning tabs doesn't prevent you from closing them, UI elements would disappear, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use it as my YouTube/spotify browser because the ad block just works. Firefox is janky because I have other extensions running that screw up playback on some sites (this has gotten a lot better but I still just use brave out of habit)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only real problem I ever had with Firefox was this privacy option that would disable auto playback on sites like Twitch and TikTok but that was a setting I wasn't even aware of. Other than that, I rarely ever have an issue with FF outside of web dev when it doesn't yet support some cutting-edge web API feature.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, it was something with various extensions I had going. I'm not blaming Firefox at all. I love Firefox. Just easier to use the other browser on the occasions when my configuration causes issues than try to troubleshoot it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've had issues with add-ons on some sites too. For those times I just use a different Firefox profile (each has its own set of add-ons and settings :D)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a good idea.