this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
307 points (86.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4083 readers
67 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

TLDR; all Britons can say what they want and express themselves freely, unless it breaks any laws or harms another person.

Isn't this a classic "freedom of speech" vs. "anti-discrimination-laws" case? Unless the laws in the UK change anytime soon, J.K. very well has the right to talk how she pleases in the confines of the law. She also can't be forced to change her vocabulary and shouldn't be afraid to be bullied if she doesn't. Whatever you may think about her, this always has to goes both ways:

Under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998, “everyone has the right to freedom of expression” in the UK. The law goes on to say that this freedom “may be subject to formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society".

In 2010 the UK also passed a law protecting it's citizens from "discrimination, harassment and victimization."

If it could be proven that J.K. harmed somebody by her speech, she could be liable for damages. At that point she could also sue back, having the most likely bigger budget than most people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

As some say "freedom to swing your arms around ends where someone else's face begins"

Although that's maybe not such a good phrase after all, as swinging your arms around to intimidate is also not acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, she is free to be a giant asshole with a persecution complex. And we are free to call her one.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

What a worthless comment. "Your freedom of speech is protected so long as it hasn't been outlawed".

Who knew.

This is why people say that Europe doesn't have freedom of speech, because unlike the US there is nothing stopping legislature from simply banning any speech.