484
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Via Oglaf (NSFW)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

"Commerce" is only possible if both parties are willing to respect each other's natural right to have private property and each other's right to express consent (voluntary exchange). By trading these goods, there is a mutual benefit (social cooperation) that emerges from wanting to satisfy their own self interest.

I think this is pretty capitalist for my taste. (And please, it's not the same as corporatocracy).

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Commerce only requires personal property, not private property. The distinction is important.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago

Your (socialist) distinction between "personal property" (consumer goods) and private property (producer goods) is purely arbitrary. The difference between consumer and producer goods is totally subjective, as it depends of the individual using that good.

Each people as its own goals, they can use various means to achieve them and their knowledge, preferences and skills are not the same.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Your understanding of the distinction between personal and private property is simply flawed. Personal property is something that is owned by a single individual for their personal use, i.e. buying a house for you and your family to live in, while private property is something owned by either an individual or a corporation of people for the sole purpose of making money, i.e. buying a house that you never plan to live in for the sole purpose of renting it out to make more money.

A corporation can own consumer goods and it be private property, like Walmarts warehouses of consumer goods, and an individual can own producer goods as their own personal property, like tools and raw materials in their workshop.

The distinction is important because it boils down to intent and the inevitable consequences of that intent. Private property solely exists to make money, and therefore will put that goal above everything, leading to things like market manipulation, exploitation, and enforced scarcity. Trade is not capitalism, and capitalism isn't "when people trade".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I didn't come to dndmemes to learn socialist theory, but appreciates it regardless

[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Commerce as you described it just sounds like ideal capitalism.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago

By "ideal capitalism" I think you meant praxeology (Mises's Human Action) and Austrian Economics.

People are not perfect, and if they make mistakes, they should be the ones responsable for their own actions. This does not happen by the existence of FIAT money, subsidies, taxation, positive rights and every regulation the Monopoly of Violence does in our private lifes and commerce.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

You made capitalism sound quite nice

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It's a well-known fact that there was no commerce in feudal societies.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Regardless of the socio-economic system imposed, commerce always persists because natural rights are inherent to human beings. Even in socialist systems, grey and black markets are going to be there.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that was my point, but maybe it got lost in the snark.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
484 points (97.5% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics

3037 readers
1 users here now

A community for Dungeons and Dragons Memes and Comics

/c/DnD Network Communities

Rules (Subject to Change)

"Title" - [Comic Name]

e.g. "Krak of Dawn" - [Swords Comic]

*Does not apply to memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS