"The areas of the MD network that were activated by reading code weren't the parts called on for maths, leaving an open question as to whether programming should be taught as a maths-based skill or a language-based skill."
They tested with Python, so this doesn't really surprise me. I suspect strongly my own experience that testing with Python both under-estimates the language involvement vs. more linguistically expressive languages but also significantly under-estimates the maths involvement relative to more formal languages, especially function and array languages. There's a marked separation between developers who see maths as essential to programming vs. those who see it as a language thing.
That they recruited from MIT, Tufts and immediate surroundings may well also affect their results.
Would be interesting to see a broader study.
I mean what were they working on?
If they’re not working with anything mathematical and they use a high level language that’s basically already English, why would the brain perceive it as maths?
I work in C# most of the time and that’s just literally English.
They were made to look at Python and ScratchJr code, it seems. So, yeah, it seems weak.
It is somewhat interesting that the language centre of the brain did not light up, but at the same time this might just mean that experienced developers treat it more as pattern-matching than reading.
But certainly not maths...
It's really a shame they didn't try a broader set of samples. Would be interesting to see if there are differences.