this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
319 points (81.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32549 readers
462 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry Python but it is what it is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's so bad about pip? Imho, the venv thing is really nice

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

vevn is not pip. The confusing set of different tools is part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

cough npm,yarn,grunt,esbuild,webpack,parcel,rollup,lasso,rollup,etc.,etc.cough

I'm not saying that Python's packaging ecosystem isn't complicated, but to paint JavaScript as anything other than nightmare fuel just isn't right.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a fair comparison, the only two libraries that are related to the actual packaging system in that list is yarn and NPM. The rest of them have to do with the complexities of actually having your code runnable in the maximum number of browsers without issue. If python was the browser scripting language, it'd likely have the same issue.

Is there a python package that transpiles and polyfills python3 to work in python 2? 2.7? 2.5?

Also, unrelated to your comment, a lot of people are dunking on npm for the black hole that is node modules (which is valid), but also saying it's not pip's fault a lot of packages don't work. It's not npm's fault the package maintainers are including all these dependencies, and there are some 0-dependency packages out there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is there a python 3 package that polyfills to Python 2?

Plenty of 'em. You ever heard of the six library?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Well I guess you could say the tools that integrate with pip are really good, then

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not that confusing. There's like 5 main different tools in total, what are you going to code if you can't even set up the workspace? That's much simpler than an installation that depends on cuda or spark, and those only require setting up environment variables after installation anyway.

As a programmer you'll encounter several redundant libraries and tools in your life where each has an edge in some use cases and you'll learn to use most to be able to adapt to the different projects you encounter, python's package manager tools are simply one of those.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Of course there are more redundant tools. It doesn't make pip suck any less though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just use poetry then

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I genuinely don't get the hate for pip, been using it for 5 years and never had an issue