this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
727 points (90.8% liked)

Comic Strips

12475 readers
3930 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sources for Salo Comics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 219 points 1 year ago (23 children)

“You’re already” makes sense as a sentence and I don’t like it lol

[–] [email protected] 190 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Y’all’s opinions are irrelevant here. We are enemies now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't understand what yinz guys is sayin

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Youse people…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't start with that philly jawn

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Philly? I do hope you're kidding

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not kidding, just ignorant 😞

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ha! That's Pittsburghese, friend!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I realized my faux pas TOO LATE! I got my yinz and jawn all mixed up!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Y’all’s is perfectly good Texan though.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

I hate you so much rn

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I threw up in my dictionary

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The reason it feels wrong is that "are" is the main verb in the sentence and shouldn't be contracted. You are only supposed to contract auxiliary verbs like "you're eating already" where eating is the main verb and are is auxiliary.

~~Edit: (I used a bad example because "eating" is a noun, as pointed out below.)~~

Un-edit: The example's correct, "eating" is a verb in this context.

Also, I'm thoroughly confused about who's saying "you're already" in this comic.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But "You're already fluffy" works without another main verb?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. It doesn't work as "you're already" and really, it doesn't work all thay well as "you are already" either. This is almost yoda levels of rearrangement.

It makes the most sense as "you already are".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yup, this is likely a phonological restriction in addition to a syntactic one, though it's worth noting that the copula (the "be" verb) shows a lot of idiosyncratic behavior in different contexts in different dialects of English.

It seems that this pattern may have something to do with stress assignment within a predicate, but I'm not sure what the conditioning environment is at first glance. Any English phonologists here who can shed some more light on this?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm no expert, but I think "you're already" doesn't work because the "anti-stress" on the contraction tells us the focus is later, but the focus of "already" is actually on the "are" in "you're". It trips us up because it sneaks the focus past us and then just ends the sentence before the focus the stress told us about arrives.

It may also be because "you are already" is a variant of the sentence "you are" which can't be contracted, so the contraction insinuates "you're already [something]". It makes us parse a different sentence structure than it is, then we get confused when the sentence ends early.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Eating" isn't a verb, either. The person you're responding to just got some terms wrong, the underlying idea about contractions is correct.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"Eating" most definitely is a verb in that context

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point, thanks I removed the "eating" example. That's what I get for commenting in the morning.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think your example is actually correct. Eating CAN be a noun, but in your example it is a present participle, a type of verb. It would be a noun if eating was the subject, ie: "eating is fun," where it would be a gerund. https://teacherblog.ef.com/grammar-recap-intro-to-gerunds-and-infinitives/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sigh I think you're right. It's the progressive form of the verb.

That's been throwing me off all day. Thanks for confirming. Grammar is confusing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Its obviously the cat's ass, which explains its facial expression.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Also, is the cat saying it? The speak marker points to the cat on the third frame not the dude on the third or fourth.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She's already what though?

Omae wa mo

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is wrong: should be "You are already", as the emphasis of the sentence is on "are"

https://youtu.be/CkZyZFa5qO0

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but I think it's not a full sentence because she smacks him before he can finish the sentence

load more comments (16 replies)