this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
643 points (98.1% liked)
Funny
6796 readers
927 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That conversation doesn't make any damn sense. Why would an interviewer ask arithmetic questions to check the ml claim?
this is a conversation from 2047. the Interviewer is checking if they are speaking with an AI/Robot
Excuse my ignorance, but what 2047?
I think they're referring to the year.
oh. I thought he might be referring to a book, movie or game.
Shoulda used a Voight-Kampff test.
It's basically a joke on how gradient descent works in machine learning.
It would have been more obviously gradient descent if they didnt start with 0, so the first gradient wasn't the same as the second answer. I thought they were just repeating the last correct answer.
Why ai would be used on a math operator beats me, but hey ho.
because
ai: I am detecting numbers, create a variable called Numbersdetected.
int ("Numbersdetected" = 0);
Now it has a value of 16.
write (Numbersdetected = "16");
Somebody wants the value of Numbersdetected.
query ("Numbersdetected");
Blade runner logic. Ask that exposing question. Get an answer.