this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
7 points (81.8% liked)

United Kingdom

4068 readers
242 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rules, which would have banned two-for-one junk-food deals,

Setting aside the issue of whether it's a good idea to address obesity in general by restricting food, which is where the focus of the article seems to be, this particular implementation doesn't seem like it would work well. Surely one can just create a larger meal at a smaller price that's functionally similar or equivalent to a two-for-one deal?

To pick on McDonalds as an example, McDonalds (used to) sell a "Mega Potato" fries in Japan that was twice the size of a large. And almost all of their existing burgers were made by increasing the size of older burgers. I'm pretty sure that they're able to figure out how to make a larger version of an item if they want to do so.