this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
219 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37740 readers
482 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the main issue of contention is just using copyrighted work to train generative AI without the author’s permission regardless.

You must define that in legal terms. This is a lawsuit, after all. It's not illegal to "just use" copyrighted work. The words "generative AI" are not in a federal or state bill anywhere in the US.

They can have an "issue of contention" all they want, but if they can't prove anything legally, they have nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly! You can't just be like "AI bad" in front of the judge ._.