Feddit UK

1349 readers

1 users here now

Community for the Feddit UK instance.
A place to log issues, and for the admins to communicate with everyone.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

We are federated with the paedophile instance (feddit.uk)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We are federated with the paedophile instance people have been complaining about. And I don't think I want to wait until their content starts showing in my time line. We need an admin ASAP or jump ship.

See here: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400367

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Has anyone actually verified the claims, or are they taking the word “paraphilia” which can be used to describe just about any fetish, to mean “this has pedophilia”?

I admit, I haven’t looked into the claim. But the only supporting evidence I have seen is the fact that pedophilia is a paraphilia.

And to be clear on why I am asking, the term paraphilia also covers things such as the entirety of BDSM, voyeurism , and exhibitionism.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you follow the link to the sh.itjust.works post?

This is not just some adult kink.

There is plenty of evidence of pedophilia there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I did a dive on that instance, it's about a month old and not super active so you can pretty much browse down all of the posts all the way back to the start. There is a diversity of discussion regarding from weird trans identities to extreme sexual desires and kinks. And yes, a good percentages of the posts openly talk about being sexually attracted to minors and it is filled with discussions trying to normalize and justify having sex with kids.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem runs much deeper than one instance, unfortunately. This thread is full of people insisting that AI-generated CSAM should be legal (and thus normalised).

To be clear, I'm quite prepared to believe that at least some of those posters have not thought it through and just don't have a good grasp of structural influences on behaviour, rather than having any personal interest in this sort of material. That kind of simplistic ultra-individualism is common on the Fediverse, unfortunately. But there is a culture problem when this sort of undergraduate philosophising gets so little pushback, and provides cover for much more sinister motivations.

With apologies to Gramsci, social media is dying and its replacement cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am not about to visit the website, but people posted screenshots on the post that I linked to.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, seems like the instance should be generally defederated from if they are fine leaving blatant stuff like that up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

(You didn’t include a link)

Edit: Seems you may have edited and I saw a cached version. I do now see a link.